Archive for February, 2011

Feedback on Our First VillageTelco Paper

We are a step closer to getting our first journal paper on the VillageTelco Project. Below is one of the reports we got on the article we submitted to the EURASIP WCN.

WCN/967260.v1 Review Report

Recommendation
Publish After Minor Changes
A. Suitability of topic
1. Is the topic appropriate for publication in this journal?
Yes
2. Is the topic important to colleagues working in the field?
Yes
B. Content
1. Is the paper technically sound?
Yes
2. Is the coverage of the topic sufficiently comprehensive and balanced?
Yes
3. How would you describe the technical depth of the paper?
Appropriate for the Generally Knowledgeable Individual Working in the Field or a Related Field
4. How would you rate the technical novelty of the paper?
Somewhat Novel
C. Presentation
1. How would you rate the overall organization of the paper?
Satisfactory
2. Are the title and abstract satisfactory?
Yes
3. Is the length of the paper appropriate?
Yes
4. Are symbols, terms, and concepts adequately defined?
Yes
5. How do you rate the English usage?
Satisfactory
6. How would you rate the Bibliography?
Satisfactory
D. Overall rating
1. How would you rate the technical content of the paper?
Good
2. How would you rate the novelty of the paper?
Sufficiently Novel
3. How would you rate the “literary” presentation of the paper?
Totally Accessible
4. How would you rate the appropriateness of this paper for publication in this journal or special issue?
Excellent Match
Comments
This paper is a good case study on Wireless Mesh Telephony technology. Several comments are listed below: * In the last paragraph of page 3, the context “a supernode would contain…”, what does a “supernode” mean ? In the next paragraph (in page 5), what does “the role of supernode to the Linksys WRT54Gx” mean ? The authors should explain the “supernode” clearly. * In the first paragraph of page 5, the term “OpenWRT” and “BATMAN” suddenly appear as important “findings”. However, these two terms are not introduced until page 6 and page 8, respectively. The authors should explain why these “findings” are important in page 5. * In the last sentence of the first paragraph of page 6, “Best of all…”, I don’t know why it is “Best of all”. The authors should give the reason. * In the last paragraph of page 8, “This has emerged as the most difficult aspect of the project.”, why is it difficult ? The authors should provide more information to this aspect.

Comments (2)