February 28, 2011 at 6:00 pm
· Filed under Collaborations, ICT and Innovation, Research Ideas
We are a step closer to getting our first journal paper on the VillageTelco Project. Below is one of the reports we got on the article we submitted to the EURASIP WCN.
WCN/967260.v1 Review Report
| Recommendation |
|
| Publish After Minor Changes |
| A. Suitability of topic |
| 1. Is the topic appropriate for publication in this journal? |
| Yes |
| 2. Is the topic important to colleagues working in the field? |
| Yes |
| B. Content |
| 1. Is the paper technically sound? |
| Yes |
| 2. Is the coverage of the topic sufficiently comprehensive and balanced? |
| Yes |
| 3. How would you describe the technical depth of the paper? |
| Appropriate for the Generally Knowledgeable Individual Working in the Field or a Related Field |
| 4. How would you rate the technical novelty of the paper? |
| Somewhat Novel |
| C. Presentation |
| 1. How would you rate the overall organization of the paper? |
| Satisfactory |
| 2. Are the title and abstract satisfactory? |
| Yes |
| 3. Is the length of the paper appropriate? |
| Yes |
| 4. Are symbols, terms, and concepts adequately defined? |
| Yes |
| 5. How do you rate the English usage? |
| Satisfactory |
| 6. How would you rate the Bibliography? |
| Satisfactory |
| D. Overall rating |
| 1. How would you rate the technical content of the paper? |
| Good |
| 2. How would you rate the novelty of the paper? |
| Sufficiently Novel |
| 3. How would you rate the “literary” presentation of the paper? |
| Totally Accessible |
| 4. How would you rate the appropriateness of this paper for publication in this journal or special issue? |
| Excellent Match |
| Comments |
| This paper is a good case study on Wireless Mesh Telephony technology. Several comments are listed below: * In the last paragraph of page 3, the context “a supernode would contain…”, what does a “supernode” mean ? In the next paragraph (in page 5), what does “the role of supernode to the Linksys WRT54Gx” mean ? The authors should explain the “supernode” clearly. * In the first paragraph of page 5, the term “OpenWRT” and “BATMAN” suddenly appear as important “findings”. However, these two terms are not introduced until page 6 and page 8, respectively. The authors should explain why these “findings” are important in page 5. * In the last sentence of the first paragraph of page 6, “Best of all…”, I don’t know why it is “Best of all”. The authors should give the reason. * In the last paragraph of page 8, “This has emerged as the most difficult aspect of the project.”, why is it difficult ? The authors should provide more information to this aspect. |
Permalink
Steve Song said,
March 1, 2011 at 2:13 pm
Congrats Michael. Looks like it was well received.
Cheers… Steve
Derek said,
March 2, 2011 at 2:21 pm
Hi Michael,
Sounds interesting – I sent you an email to your crg address about this.
Kind regards,
Derek